Skip to main content

 

A couple of weeks ago I had decided there were two kinds of Mormons in the world; those who’ll vote for Mitt Romney and those who won’t. But a sudden change in Mormonism has forced me to amend my first stance.

As of right now there’s the mormons who still drink the recently approved caffeine, and then there’s those who have spent years fighting the substance and have no idea what to do with themselves now.

Everything has changed. The Mormon culture as we know it has been turned on its head. How many years have we spent debating the substance?

Think back to every uncomfortable Word of Wisdom lesson you ever had at church. Every time someone brought up caffeine and the discussion grew heated and went all dark-side. What is that Sunday School teacher who so valiantly argued that Cola was the drink of sinners because ‘he heard it on Sixty-Minutes‘ doing now?

What about my church issued Philippines Missionary flip chart (which I still have) that clearly has the word Caffeine listed there beneath coffee, tea, and alcohol?

Holy crap! What are my parents doing? For years my mom and dad drilled into me that caffeinated drinks were bad and we as mormons do not partake. I remember going to school parties and saying ‘no’ to a glass of Coca-Cola because it was bad.

For years now I have been a closet caffeine drinker, afraid to be caught partaking of my Mountain Dew. Now what? Do I come out of the closet and announce my caffeine addiction?

And what brought upon us this sudden announcement anyway?

Did a member sneak a photo of President Monson drinking a Red Bull before conference (he is the only one who stays awake) and threaten to Facebook it? Or perhaps the First Presidency’s tired of having members shake their hands and ask, “What of the caffeine?”.

Or maybe…just maybe…it’s a ploy to help get Romney the office. I’m sure Mitt drinks Coca-Cola. With caffeine always being a bizarre ‘hot button’ for those outside the church, what would they say if he was caught drinking cola? Would they harass him for not only being unable to make up his mind but that he can’t even be loyal to his own church too?

Okay but seriously that probably isn’t it. It’s just irony that this announcement came this close to the election…right?

What of the Sixty Minutes interview? What was that all about? Did President Hinckley just speak personally? Or maybe it’s  a higher law (see my missionary flip chart), but the members of North America aren’t ready to live it. Come on, tell me you wouldn’t pitch a fit if the church announced all Coke drinkers were not temple worthy. Doesn’t matter though…cause they didn’t. And maybe that’s it, too many members already partake. To ban them from the church would cut membership down to nothing.

In the end I’m typing this while drinking my energy drink and wondering if so much really will change after all. There will still be those who refuse to believe the church’s stance. BYU already refuses to accept the official church ruling by accepting caffeine on campus, forcing its users to continue shamefully covering their drinks with brown paper bags.

On the flip side, I don’t doubt my parents judgement in banning the stuff. Caffeine hasn’t exactly been in the spot light for good health with its ability to increase blood pressure and cause temporary ADD when overdosed.

Still here I am looking over the contents of my now morally accepted drink:

Sugar

Yellow Number 5

Sodium

Caffeine (equal to one cup of coffee)

Wait…my drink has as much caffeine as a cup of coffee?

Hmmmm…………

Oh well, sorry Starbucks. Maybe next time.

 

-The Token Single Guy

 

 

No Comments

  • kayleigh says:

    I just think its a moderation thing. I’ll drink some pepsi, not exceeding a can, but energy drinks are nuts.Theres a ton of caffiene in there!

  • Stephanie says:

    The Church didn’t come out and say caffeine is okay. They just said it isn’t part of our Word of Wisdom. It’s still not good for you…in large quantities. I have used it medicinally for years to treat my migraines after a doctor at BYU told me to. They are allowing us our agency to choose what’s right. There are a lot of substances that are bad for us. They aren’t gong to list them all. It’s too bad the Mormon culture grabbed ahold of caffeine and rolled with it all these years. It’s not like Mormons are great at adhering to the Word of Wisdom anyway…ever been to Tucanos. There’s no eating meat sparingly there! We’d all do well to study the W of W and live by it!

  • Brian says:

    Here is the deal: “We are not commanded in all things. . . ” There also is so much in the Word of Wisdom about what we should eat which happens to coincide with what modern health experts recommend. I am a middle aged High Priest in my 40s. 75% of my quorum have health problems mostly related to what they ate or did not eat, and by not exercising. Many are unfit physically after retirement to serve as missionaries like the church so desperately needs. I myself struggle but try to stay motivated and strive to eat less and exercise. One of the biggest culprits, late onset diabetes related to high intake sugar consumption over the years. It is about balance. It is about me taking the food “mote” out of my own eye before I enforce the caffeinated made up “beam” on others. It is about me staying healthy so I can go on missions in my retired years. Sometimes health issues catch up to us regardless but I should do everything I can to live the Word of Wisdom, eat well, and exercise to not bring them down on myself. The Church’s announcement to not totally restrict caffeinated beverages should be a wake-up call to “not be commanded in all things” and make wise eating decisions. It should not be an excuse to go nuts on the drinks that really are not good for us anyway in excess.

  • Steve says:

    I wonder what would happen if a similar announcement was made concerning mild barley drinks, a.k.a. beer. I suspect that just as there are/were a lot of closet Mt. Dew drinkers, there are probably a lot of closet Bud Light drinkers as well.

  • Macy's Chris :P says:

    Eh, Coffee has 19 known rodent carcinogens that may or may not affect humans, tanic acid etc. can cause ulcers and gastritis, it is linked to a significant increase in stillbirths in mothers as well as iron deficiency anemia in both pregnant mothers and their fetuses. The drinking of any “scalding hot” drink has been linked to throat cancer. It generally seems that caffeine (have you noticed that the word caffeine disobeys the “i” before “e” rule?) is only one of many issues. The same can be said of most drinks that contain caffiene, but I think part of the point is not to have a Law of Moses thing on us all over again. It’s kind of a fun battle to watch sometimes anyways, watching two people beat their heads and forget basic Christian principles of kindness and non-judgement over something that probably doesn’t matter much anyways.
    “I’m gonna tell Bishop about you drinking energy drinks!”
    “I’ll let you tell Bishop about the affair you had with your wife when you’re ready to stop covering your sins with judgement and repent”
    Is either one really right?

Leave a Reply